Bridezilla Ballot: Are Ugly Celebrity Groomzillas Better Mates?

Posted by on 30 Aug, 2007

groomzilla.jpg
You don’t have to be Perez Hilton to have noticed the recent rash of outwardly unfortunate Bridezilla-and-the Beast unions that seem to be cropping up all over Hollywood. Janet Jackson and Jermaine Dupri. Jennifer Lopez and Marc Antony. Christina Aguilera and Jordan Bratman. Such an uprising of ugly causes Bridezilla to contemplate a possible new celebrity trend: are un-handsome Groomzillas the new adopted orphans?
This theory gains levity when you consider the correlation between a plainer Groomzilla and a longer relationship duration. All of the above unions have lasted longer and with seemingly more success than such physically perfect pairings as Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston or Jessica Simpson and Nick Lachey.
So the question Bridezilla poses is this: do egalitarian relationships have to include physical equality? Or is the whole “really, really good personality” actually the key to monogamous happiness? Weigh in below!

Leave a Comment

  1. On 30 Aug, 2007, Ariana said:

    As much as I’d like to not be shallow, Looks are important. But also, looks are subjective to the person viewing them….beauty is in the eye of the beholder, I know, we’ve all heard it.

    Reply to this comment
  2. On 30 Aug, 2007, Ariana said:

    As much as I’d like to not be shallow, Looks are important. But also, looks are subjective to the person viewing them….beauty is in the eye of the beholder, I know, we’ve all heard it.

    Reply to this comment
  3. On 05 Feb, 2011, Jayne Iheme said:

    I have not checked in here for a while as I thought it was getting boring, but the last few posts are great quality so I guess I’ll add you back to my daily bloglist. You deserve it my friend :)

    Reply to this comment
  4. On 12 Mar, 2011, chat said:

    Good information once again! Thanks!/12.03.2011 20:44:00

    Reply to this comment